Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 839 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 325% better in Cities: Skylines II than Athlon 3000G - 51 vs 12 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Chagall | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |