Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 2738 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 235 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
