Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is 2787 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Core i3-4160T - 188 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2118
100%
Multi-Core
15921
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |