Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 200 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 2200G - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $130.0 vs $557.22
- Up to 75% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.76 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
24%
Price, $
$557.22
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $557.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
170
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Colfax | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |