Buy on Amazon
$1,075
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $513
Availability
MSRP in USD: $513
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 423 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 210 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 127 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
202
96%
Value, $/FPS
$5.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD295XA8AFWOF)
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 127 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
