Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 391 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 433 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $545.0 vs $999.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $1.26 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 127 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 48 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
433
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$545
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |