Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1956 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 52% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 85 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $529.99 vs $1075.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $6.24 vs $19.2 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |