Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 137 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $440.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $3.21 vs $8.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |