Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1787 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $130.0 vs $419.95
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 53% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 249 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
36.52014652014652%
Multi-Core
2858
16.597944131482663%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |