Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 855 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Core i7-6900K - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $120.0 vs $682.1
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.7 vs $3.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.97/FPS
17%
Price, $
$682.1
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $682.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |