Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 708 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $750.0 vs $1595.95
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 145 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 44 vs 24 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77851 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Colfax | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 22 |
24 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 145 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |