Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2778 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $120.0 vs $529.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-14900F - $0.8 vs $3.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Dead Space than Core i7-6900K - 168 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9885 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
25%
Price, $
$529.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9883 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |