Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 1076 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 422 vs 403 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $179.99 vs $576.53
- Up to 70% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.43 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
403
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
30%
Price, $
$576.53
31%
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
422
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |