Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 1045 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-7920X - 110 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $179.99 vs $557.04
- Up to 69% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-7920X - $1.64 vs $5.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 24 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3031 minutes ago
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |