Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Ryzen 5 3600: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

3.4 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor

Buy for $493 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

3.6 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler

Buy for $85.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

3.4 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor

Buy for $493 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

3.6 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler

Buy for $85.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 696 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  • Performs up to 11% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 80 vs 72 FPS
  • Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $85.99 vs $493.0
  • Up to 84% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.07 vs $6.85 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
This is a free version of Cyberpunk 2077.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

RT Overdrive

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017


FPS

72

90%

Value, $/FPS

$6.85/FPS

15%

Price, $

$493

17%

AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor

Buy for $493 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Logo
Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

80

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.07/FPS

100%

Price, $

$85.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler

Buy for $85.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

RT Overdrive

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Logo
Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017


Single-Core

1171

73%

Multi-Core

7539

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Logo
Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1597

100%

Multi-Core

6884

91%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Aug 10th, 2017Release Date
Jul 7th, 2019
Ryzen ThreadripperCollectionRyzen 5
WhitehavenCodenameMatisse
AMD Socket SP3r2SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16
Cores6
32
Threads12
3.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
180 WTDP
65 W
14 nmProcess Size
7 nm
34.0xMultiplier
36.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Ryzen 5 3600

Cyberpunk 2077, 1920 x 1080, RT Overdrive

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.