Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 665 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - 179 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $89.99 vs $326.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - $0.5 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1582 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
173
96.64804469273743%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
26.595744680851062%
Price, $
$326
27%
Buy for $326 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |