Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2148 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2700K - 177 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $89.0 vs $557.04
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-7920X - $0.53 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
16%
Price, $
$557.04
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17815 minutes ago
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17814 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |