Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-2700K vs Core i9-10900KF

Core i7-2700K vs Core i9-10900KF: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-2700K

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-2700K Logo
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K

Buy for $88.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75070 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900KF

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900KF Logo
Intel Core i9-10900KF Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W

Buy for $249 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75071 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-2700K

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-2700K Logo
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K

Buy for $88.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75070 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900KF

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900KF Logo
Intel Core i9-10900KF Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W

Buy for $249 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75071 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K

  • Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $88.99 vs $249.0
  • Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF

  • Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2700K - 198 vs 148 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 20 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Dirt 5.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i7-2700K Logo
Core i7-2700K

Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011


FPS

148

74.74747474747475%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$88.99

100%

Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K

Buy for $88.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75070 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-10900KF Logo
Core i9-10900KF

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

198

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$249

35%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900KF Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W

Buy for $249 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75071 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i7-2700K Logo
Core i7-2700K

Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011

Intel Core i9-10900KF Logo
Core i9-10900KF

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-2700K Logo
Core i7-2700K

Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011


Single-Core

664

37.66307430516166%

Multi-Core

2264

24.732357439370766%

Intel Core i9-10900KF Logo
Core i9-10900KF

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1763

100%

Multi-Core

9154

100%

Intel Core i7-2700K Logo

Intel Core i7-2700K

vs
Intel Core i9-10900KF Logo

Intel Core i9-10900KF

Oct 24th, 2011Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7CollectionCore i9
Sandy BridgeCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
10
8Threads
20
3.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz
95 W
TDP125 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
35.0xMultiplier
37.0x
Intel HD 3000
Integrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Core i7-2700K or Core i9-10900KF

Dirt 5, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.