Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1283 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-7920X - 123 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $89.95 vs $557.04
- Up to 84% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-7920X - $0.73 vs $4.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17828 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |