Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2388 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-5930K - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $86.43 vs $549.95
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $86.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74751 minutes ago
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |