Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 299 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $269.0 vs $448.75
- Up to 33% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-8086K - $0.51 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8086K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 592 vs 530 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
530
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Buy for $448.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 40th |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |