Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 516 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $218.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.2 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4666 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$218
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $218 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |