Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1082 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $270.0 vs $279.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 182 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.53 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4667 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |