Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 143 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $200.72 vs $270.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.4 vs $2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$200.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $200.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |