Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400 is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 145 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $229.99 vs $270.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.59 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |