Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 695 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $225.0 vs $260.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-8086K - $1.65 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8086K - 20 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8086K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 40th | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |