Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1962 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $109.99 vs $189.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.27 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 480 vs 403 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
403
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2757 minutes ago
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |