Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HX is 1665 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7551P - 142 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX - 64 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | EPYC |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
