Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i3-10320 - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $120.0 vs $495.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.59 vs $2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11632 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |