Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 1074 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4160T - 158 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
