Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 1155 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1840 - 396 vs 373 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
