Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 6800HS is 1665 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EPYC 7551P - 211 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS - 64 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 7 6800HS
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
