Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800H is 1995 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-4160T - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 4800H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 4800H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
