Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 471 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930 - 175 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $19.65 vs $180.0
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Buy for $19.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
54.57809694793537%
Multi-Core
1043
19.001639642922207%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |