Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $19.65 vs $210.0
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 48% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930 - 235 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $19.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
37.71712158808933%
Multi-Core
1043
14.42400774443369%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |