Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is 2117 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4160T - 185 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Mobile • May 7th, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
May 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
