Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 359 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $188.99 vs $528.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-14900F - $1.24 vs $3.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 5 7600 - 157 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
153
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $188.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
36%
Price, $
$528.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |