Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-11900KF - 140 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $232.0 vs $528.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900F - $1.76 vs $3.78 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.78/FPS
46%
Price, $
$528.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |