Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8350 - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $182.02 vs $528.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.82 vs $2.19 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
37%
Price, $
$528.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |