Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600HS outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600HS is 921 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7551P - 184 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 64 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Renoir | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
