Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 668 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 528 vs 526 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $59.4 vs $89.5
- Up to 35% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.11 vs $0.17 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
528
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
64.70588235294117%
Price, $
$89.5
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57426 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
526
99.62121212121212%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |