Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1816 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 37% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6350 - 329 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-6350 - $85.76 vs $100.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6350 - $0.26 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
329
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |