Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 375 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $106.47 vs $109.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.58 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 2500X - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
182
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
98%
Price, $
$109.99
96%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |