Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 70 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 15 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Ryzen 3 3250U - 186 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
