Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1630 days older than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 6 than Ryzen 3 3200U - 106 vs 101 FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
