Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $81.39 vs $554.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-14900 - $0.32 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 3200G - 303 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
255
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5143 minutes ago
Buy for $554.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |