Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2792 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 18% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3960X - 316 vs 267 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $78.32 vs $295.16
- Up to 77% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3960X - $0.25 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
316
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for $295.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |