Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2552 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 185 vs 141 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-6350 - $94.99 vs $100.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - $0.51 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |