Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $65.23 vs $117.09
- Up to 43% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-10400 - $0.26 vs $0.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 1300X - 257 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
254
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
56%
Price, $
$117.09
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $117.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |