Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1550 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than FX-6350 - 195 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $100.0 vs $395.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.53 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 6 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3730 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |